| | Using Poulantzas' mode of analysis to provide a framework of understanding and periodising the state, and the often referred to but seldom defined phenomenon of 'neo-colonialism' . Shows that the neo-colonial state has a different basis for 'hegemony' - clientelism - than in the centre states, and that it is particularist not 'national' . Also explores the circumstances under which there could be a break-up of the dominant class basis of and of factional popular support for the neo-colonial state. |